Skip to main content

Doctoral Recipients by Undergraduate College, 1958--2023

This is a popular post each year with high school and independent counselors working with students who are already thinking about a doctorate.  It shows the undergraduate institutions of doctoral recipients from 1958 to 2023.  (It does not show where the doctorate was earned, to be clear.)

It's based on data I downloaded from the National Science Foundation using their custom tool.  It's a little clunky, and--this is important--it classifies academic areas differently before 2020 and after, but with a little (OK, a lot) of data wrangling over the long weekend, we have something for the data junkies out there.

This is for fun and entertainment only, because, as I indicated, the categories are not quite the same, and for the sake of clarity, I had to combine similar (but not identical) disciplines.

There are two views, using the tabs across the top.  The "All Data" view allows you to filter to your heart's content.  The purple boxes allow you to limit the type of institution of the bachelor's degree recipients: You may want to look at Public Universities in the Southeast, for instance, or all Catholic colleges (listed as "Roman Catholic" in the filter, by the way).  The tan boxes allow you to specify the doctoral degree area (Chemistry, or Political Science, for instance), and to limit the years.  You might want to look at 2017 to 2023, or you might want to get nostalgic and look at 1958 to 1965, for instance.

The bars, which are colored by Broad Carnegie type, display the counts.  Us the scroll function at the right to see more data.

The "Top 30" view limits to those places that produce the most students earning doctorates.   The labels show you the Rank (in orange), the counts (in blue) and the percent of total (in purple).  The percents are only calculated on the group you've selected, not the grand totals.

This always generates four questions:

Can you show these as a percentage of the graduates of this institution?  No, because not everyone who graduates with a doctorate does it in the same time.  I'd have to take lots of data and make some wild guesses. 

Can you show what these students majored in at the undergraduate level?  No, that's not available in the public sets, and I don't want to apply for the restricted use license.  If you do, and you want me to work on this, let me know.

Can you crosstab this data to show, for instance, where the Stanvard graduates earned their doctorate?  Again, it's not in the public data set, so no. 

What about other doctorates, like MD or Pharm.D or DDS?  It's not included: These are research doctorates only. 

If you use this in your business and want to support my time and software and hosting costs, you can do so here.  If you're a high school counselor or a student or parent, just skip that link.

Comments

  1. S LDecember 4, 2024 at 8:29 AM

    Thanks for publishing these data. It appears Penn State Main Campus is missing while the branch campuses are included. Do you know why this is?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jon BoeckenstedtDecember 4, 2024 at 8:47 AM

      Penn State has changed its reporting mechanisms several times over the last decade. It went from PSU Main with Branch Campuses to The Pennsylvania State University (all consolidated) and now back again. Normalizing the data over time would require an incredible amount of manual data entry and corrections that I'm not inclined to do. The people at IPEDS are also frustrated with this, and don't have a solution.

      Compounding this is the fact that this is a 2023 IPEDS file merged with the NSF data over 65 years.

      Delete
  2. Parke MuthDecember 5, 2024 at 9:43 PM

    I'm surprised by just many more doctorates Oberlin has produced compared to any other baccalaureate school--6090. Next is Swarthmore at 4240. I

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Changes in AP Scores, 2022 to 2024

Used to be, with a little work, you could download very detailed data on AP results from the College Board website: For every state, and for every course, you could see performance by ethnicity.  And, if you wanted to dig really deep, you could break out details by private and public schools, and by grade level.  I used to publish the data every couple of years. Those days are gone.  The transparency The College Board touts as a value seems to have its limits, and I understand this to some extent: Racists loved to twist the data using single-factor analysis, and that's not good for a company who is trying to make business inroads with under-represented communities as they cloak their pursuit of revenue as an altruistic push toward access. They still publish data, but as I wrote about in my last post , it's far less detailed; what's more, what is easily accessible is fairly sterile, and what's more detailed seems to be structured in a way that suggests the company doesn...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Changes in SAT Scores after Test-optional

One of the intended consequences of test-optional admission policies at some institutions prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was to raise test scores reported to US News and World Report.  It's rare that you would see a proponent of test-optional admission like me admit that, but to deny it would be foolish. Because I worked at DePaul, which was an early adopter of the approach (at least among large universities), I fielded a lot of calls from colleagues who were considering it, some of whom were explicit in their reasons for doing so.  One person I spoke to came right out at the start of the call: She was only calling, she said, because her provost wanted to know how much they could raise scores if they went test-optional. If I sensed or heard that motivation, I advised people against it.  In those days, the vast majority of students took standardized admission tests like the SAT or ACT, but the percentage of students applying without tests was still relatively small; the ne...
Post a Comment
Read more