Skip to main content

It's going to be hard

I've posted this visualization a few times, but never embedded it in a blog post.

Now's the time.  Teresa Watanabe of the LA Times tweeted this today.


So, for the foreseeable future, no one will need an ACT or SAT to gain admission to the UC or Cal State system campuses.  And in fact, testing won't help you get in, either.  For lots of students, there will be no need to test. Consider:

  • In 2018, about 275,000 students enrolled in California public four-year, and private, not-for-profit four year institutions (I'm using 2018 as it's the last good year prior to 2020's COVID-affected enrollment numbers).
  • Just under 250,000 of them came from California. 
  • California exported about 40,000 students to other states. About 90% of them (roughly 36,000) went to the types of colleges that might require the SAT or ACT (four-year public and private not-for-profits).
What this means: Fewer students testing in California.  Neighboring and western test-optional-friendly states like Oregon, Washington, and Arizona will likely see fewer tests as well.  This will probably mean fewer test dates, or fewer test centers.  Maybe reductions in school day SATs as well.

In short, taking the test could end up being more trouble than it's worth.  This will send some ripples through private colleges in California too.  They'll have to compete for students, but more important, they'll have to convince students that yes, Berkeley can make a good admissions decision without the SAT, but we need it.  Good luck.

And then there are those colleges that enroll a lot of students from California.  They'll have to make the same argument, and they'll be adding an extra step in the admission process.  Some will be able to get away with it, of course, if they choose to do so.  Others might find it risky.

If you use Higher Ed Data Stories in your work and you're not a high school counselor, you can support the visualizations and web hosting fees by buying me a beer at this link.  (Please, no high school counselors, and no repeat supporters.)

There are just two views below.  The first is a map that shows all the colleges who have California in their top five feeder states.  Orange marks are public, blue marks are private institutions.  The number shows the rank (a 3 means California is the third most represented state in the freshman class).  The size of the mark indicates how many freshmen enrolled in 2018.  Just hover for details.  If you want to just show the 1st most important, or the 2nd and 3rd, use the slider to limit that view.  

The second view is a bar series.  The bars from left are: The rank of California in the freshman class, the total number of freshmen, and the number from California in 2018.  For instance, at Oberlin, California was the #1 state in the freshmen class of 696, with 97 freshmen from California.

Think about what happens to a lot of those California apps if you go back to requiring tests.  And ask yourself if you feel lucky.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Educational Attainment and the Presidential Elections

I've been fascinated for a while by the connection between political leanings and education: The correlation is so strong that I once suggested that perhaps Republicans were so anti-education because, in general, places with a higher percentage of bachelor's degree recipients were more likely to vote for Democrats. The 2024 presidential election puzzled a lot of us in higher education, and perhaps these charts will show you why: We work and probably hang around mostly people with college degrees (or higher).  Our perception is limited. With the 2024 election data just out , I thought I'd take a look at the last three elections and see if the pattern I noticed in 2016 and 2020 held.  Spoiler: It did, mostly. Before you dive into this, a couple of tips: Alaska's data is always reported in a funky way, so just ignore it here.  It's a small state (in population, that is) and it's very red.  It doesn't change the overall trends even if I could figure out how to c...
Post a Comment
Read more

First-year student (freshman) migration, 2022

A new approach to freshman migration, which is always a popular post on Higher Ed Data Stories. If you're a regular reader, you can go right to the visualization and start interacting with it.  And I can't stress enough: You need to use the controls and click away to get the most from these visualizations. If you're new, this post focuses on one of the most interesting data elements in IPEDS: The geographic origins of first-year (freshman) students over time.  My data set includes institutions in the 50 states and DC.  It includes four-year public and four-year, private not-for-profits that participate in Title IV programs; and it includes traditional institutions using the Carnegie classification (Doctoral, Masters, Baccalaureate, and Special Focus Schools in business, engineering, and art/design. Data from other institutions is noisy and often unreliable, or (in the case of colleges in Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and other territories, often shows close to 100% of enro...
Post a Comment
Read more

Changes in AP Scores, 2022 to 2024

Used to be, with a little work, you could download very detailed data on AP results from the College Board website: For every state, and for every course, you could see performance by ethnicity.  And, if you wanted to dig really deep, you could break out details by private and public schools, and by grade level.  I used to publish the data every couple of years. Those days are gone.  The transparency The College Board touts as a value seems to have its limits, and I understand this to some extent: Racists loved to twist the data using single-factor analysis, and that's not good for a company who is trying to make business inroads with under-represented communities as they cloak their pursuit of revenue as an altruistic push toward access. They still publish data, but as I wrote about in my last post , it's far less detailed; what's more, what is easily accessible is fairly sterile, and what's more detailed seems to be structured in a way that suggests the company doesn...
Post a Comment
Read more