Skip to main content

Freshman enrollment and migration from 30,000 feet

You know I love this data set of freshman migration patterns over time.  It shows every college in two year increments, and contains the state-by-state makeup of the freshman class.  I like it for a couple of reasons: First, it's interesting in its own right to see where colleges attract students from.  I think students can use it too, to see how geographically diverse the colleges they're looking at really are.

But beyond that, there are so many questions you can pose this data and come away with some insight. Previously, I've visualized this data several times, most recently here, with a focus on helping high school and independent counselors add a layer of information to student choice sets.  This time, I think it might be of interest to enrollment management people and perhaps state policy makers.  Or anyone who finds this interesting.

If you find Higher Ed Data Stories helpful in your work and you're not a high school counselor, you can support the cost of building and hosting this site by buying me a coffee, here

The data are easy.  Getting it all on one chart can be hard, as you'll see.  And I kid you not, as I was typing just now, I thought of a new dashboard to add.  So I'm going to add an eighth view to this.

OK, done.  Here are the views:

Summary of enrollment shows the highest level view of freshman enrollment over time (with the understanding that the data in this set is for freshmen who enrolled within twelve months of high school graduation.)  Use the filters at right to view only types of student migration, or college or student regions, to see how those patterns differ.  Use the Highlight Selector to emphasize one sector.

Uber Summary contains a lot of information.  At left are overall patterns (the view starts with the US).  Choose a state using the filter if you wish; at far left are destinations by type.  You can see that in most years about 2/3 of all students enroll at a public institution in-state (the yellow bars).  Hover for more detail.  The columns break that data out even more.  You can see, for instance, that in 2018, 48.49% of all students nationally who enrolled out-of-state but in region enrolled in a four-year private college.  The interest comes when you look at different states.

Scatter with animation shows each state plotted by its rank among the states in two dimensions: How many students (number)  it exports, and what percentage of all students from that state the number represents.  Click through the arrows to animate over time, and I think you'll be surprised by how stable things appear to be.  By way of example, in 1996, Minnesota ranked 18th in number of exports, and 15th in percentage of exports.

Rank of export percent looks like a red hot mess, until you use the Highlight box at the top.  See how your chosen state fares over time on the percentage of freshmen it sends out-of-state.

Rank of export number is the same chart, but ranking raw numbers.

Single state allows you to see a state over time, with the total number of freshmen from that state (in gray) along with the number who stayed and the number who left.

State breakdown shows destinations of students by control, and Carnegie types.  After you choose a state of interest using the filter, and select the year, you can click on any bar and use that as a filter as well.

For-profits and non-residents shows how for-profit institutions have fared over time.  As you've seen from the previous charts, not a lot of freshmen who go to college within 12 months of graduation attend for-profits, so this is almost inconsequential.  However, what was surprising to me was the number of students these colleges attracted from out-of-state: An all-time record in 2020, despite COVID.

If you work in EM, you can use this to see how receptive that new market you're eyeing really is to colleges like yours.  If you work in higher ed policy in your state, you might find this compelling as you talk to people in your state house.  And if you work in a university but not in admissions, you might find that you don't make big changes overnight, and maybe those new markets aren't as attractive as you think they might be.

As always, leave me a not below with the things you find interesting.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

On Rankings, 1911, and Economic Mobility

If you're alive today, you have lived your whole life with college rankings.  Yes, even you.  You may not have knows you were living in the time of college rankings, but indeed, you have been, unless you were born before 1911 (or maybe earlier.)  If you're interested, you can read this Twitter thread from 2020 where I discuss them and include snippets of those 1911 rankings as well as those from 1957, written by Chesley Manly. You can read for yourself, or you can trust me, that in fact the rankings as we know them have been surprisingly consistent over time, and most people would have only minor quibbles with the ratings from 1911.  Perhaps that's because they have always tended to measure the same thing. But what if we did different rankings?  No, not like the Princeton Review where they make an attempt to measure best party school, or best cafeteria food, or worst social life.  Something more quantifiable and concrete, although still, admittedly, a hard thing to get rig

Freshman Migration, 1986 to 2020

(Note: I discovered that in IPEDS, Penn State Main Campus now reports with "The Pennsylvania State University" as one system.  So when you'd look at things over time, Penn State would have data until 2018, and then The Penn....etc would show up in 2020.  I found out Penn State main campus still reports its own data on the website, so I went there, and edited the IPEDS data by hand.  So if you noticed that error, it should be corrected now, but I'm not sure what I'll do in years going forward.) Freshman migration to and from the states is always a favorite visualization of mine, both because I find it a compelling and interesting topic, and because I had a few breakthroughs with calculated variables the first time I tried to do it. If you're a loyal reader, you know what this shows: The number of freshman and their movement between the states.  And if you're a loyal viewer and you use this for your work in your business, please consider supporting the costs