Skip to main content

The last normal year: Freshman Discounts at Private Colleges, 2019

Each year, NACUBO comes out with its discount study.  If you're not a member, you get a nice press release and some pdfs.  Even if you are a member, you only get a chance to buy the study. And that's enough for most people.  But not for the readers of Higher Ed Data Stories, I've found.

Let's talk about discount for a minute.  Different colleges talk about it differently, and even with this IPEDS data, it's impossible to be precise.  But discount rate essentially calculates how much of a college's tuition revenue is offered to students as institutional financial aid.

But there are some nuances to it.  Let's start with an example.  College X enrolls 1,000 students, and it charges tuition of $40,000.  That means gross revenue is $40,000,000.  If that college offers institutional aid of $10,000,000 to students, its discount rate is 10/40 or 25%.  If it offers $20,000,000 its discount is 20/40 or 50%.  Sounds easy.

But the assumption is that this aid is unfunded.  That is, for a typical student under that second scenario, college X says, "We'll charge you $40,000 and then apply a "scholarship" of $20,000, which is really an accounting transaction.  In other words, we'll educate you for $20,000 in cash. We've discounted your tuition by 50%.

Some aid, but typically not much, at private colleges in America is funded aid.  That is, it comes in as cash from another source, like an endowed scholarship.  When that happens, College X might charge $40,000, offer $10,000 of unfunded discount, and then use $10,000 of funded aid from that scholarship.  In this case, the college's net revenue is $30,000 ($10,000 from the scholarship in cash, and $20,000 from the student).  The discount is then only 25%.

Of course, most colleges have students with a range of discounts, and they all add up to create one number, which tells you about the college, not individual students. 

For this, we're going to assume that all institutional aid is unfunded, because, as I indicated, most of it is.

That net revenue piece is important, too.  Colleges need cash to operate (amazingly, some people think "not-for-profit" means colleges don't care about money.  They care.)  If that student in the first scenario is from a upper-middle class family, the $20,000 might come from family money like savings or checking or a 529 plan.  If that student comes from a very low-income family, the $20,000 might come from a Pell Grant of $6,000, a state grant of $5,000, a campus job, and a loan.  Where that cash comes from makes no difference to the college.  It's all cash, and it explains why colleges with lower tuitions can often afford to enroll lower-income students.

Is this helpful?  Do you use it in your job?  If so, I appreciate your supporting my costs to run Higher Ed Data Stories.  You can do so by clicking this link.  (If you're a high school counselor, or you work with a CBO counseling low-income students, you've already done enough.  Just ignore the link.)

This visualization shows freshman discount, net revenue, and other data for the entering class of 2019, and should not be taken as a definitive snapshot of a college's financial health.  You will find colleges on this visualization that don't make sense: College of the Ozarks, Cooper Union, Soka University, BYU, Webb Institute, Berea College, and others that have very different financial models.  Try to ignore them.  

I've started most of the views looking at Doctoral, Master's, and Baccalaureate institutions only.  There are two other categories (Special focus and "Other") that expand the universe, but add some noise.  These might include Baptist Seminaries, Rabbinical Schools, Art Institutes, or other colleges that operate under different models.  Add them back in, or look at them by themselves.

One final thought: The year 2019 represents the last entering class before COVID, and will likely be the last year where these numbers are meaningful for a while, although it will be interesting to see how things change in 2020 and beyond.  And I only do this for private colleges, because public institutions have different funding models and different university foundation relationships from state-to-state, and thus comparisons across borders are mostly meaningless (although you can do this yourself for publics within your state.  I do.) 

Now, the views:

Regional Overview shows rolled up weighted Average Net Revenue, Average Discount rate, and Average Net Revenue per student.  One filter at top left lets you choose different types of colleges.

Selectivity and Net Revenue shows the relationship between admit rates and net revenue.  Two filters let you change the colleges displayed, and the Highlight box allows you to find a college in the mass.  Just type any part of the name (typing "Dayton" and hitting enter will allow you to select from University of Dayton or two other colleges with Dayton in the name.  The bubbles are sized by the 2018 undergrad enrollment.

Revenue/Pell/Endowment has the same filters, but displays in two dimensions Average Net Revenue and the Percentage of Freshmen with Pell.  The bubbles are sized by the FY 2018 Endowment per FTE or full-time-equivalent student.  And it's important to note that endowment, while nice to have, is not just a big pot of money you can use to write checks; sometimes endowment gifts can actually cost an institution money (but you'd still want more endowment, probably.)

Discount and Net Revenue Bars has the same filters, but displays each college's data for discount and net revenue.  Cut down the view to compare similar institutions.  You can sort the data by clicking on the icon at the bottom near the axis label.  And you can always start fresh using the controls at bottom right.

If you're a young admissions or financial aid person, these are concepts you need to understand if you want to advance in your career.  If you're a high school counselor or parent, this might be a good place to put your feet down, but it's not designed to offer individual student guidance.

Let me know what you see.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

On Rankings, 1911, and Economic Mobility

If you're alive today, you have lived your whole life with college rankings.  Yes, even you.  You may not have knows you were living in the time of college rankings, but indeed, you have been, unless you were born before 1911 (or maybe earlier.)  If you're interested, you can read this Twitter thread from 2020 where I discuss them and include snippets of those 1911 rankings as well as those from 1957, written by Chesley Manly. You can read for yourself, or you can trust me, that in fact the rankings as we know them have been surprisingly consistent over time, and most people would have only minor quibbles with the ratings from 1911.  Perhaps that's because they have always tended to measure the same thing. But what if we did different rankings?  No, not like the Princeton Review where they make an attempt to measure best party school, or best cafeteria food, or worst social life.  Something more quantifiable and concrete, although still, admittedly, a hard thing to get rig

Freshman Migration, 1986 to 2020

(Note: I discovered that in IPEDS, Penn State Main Campus now reports with "The Pennsylvania State University" as one system.  So when you'd look at things over time, Penn State would have data until 2018, and then The Penn....etc would show up in 2020.  I found out Penn State main campus still reports its own data on the website, so I went there, and edited the IPEDS data by hand.  So if you noticed that error, it should be corrected now, but I'm not sure what I'll do in years going forward.) Freshman migration to and from the states is always a favorite visualization of mine, both because I find it a compelling and interesting topic, and because I had a few breakthroughs with calculated variables the first time I tried to do it. If you're a loyal reader, you know what this shows: The number of freshman and their movement between the states.  And if you're a loyal viewer and you use this for your work in your business, please consider supporting the costs