Skip to main content

A first look at pandemic enrollments

This week our trade publication, The Chronicle of Higher Education took a quick look at changes in enrollment between Fall, 2019, and Fall, 2020.  If you don't work in higher ed, you can read a few stories per month for free with a registration.  If you do, there is no reason you shouldn't be a subscriber.

Something happened in the spring of 2019 that might have had a big effect on college enrollment.  But we're never, of course, 100% sure just how much effect it had.  But the subject is fascinating, of course, and I found the Chronicle's overview to be less than fulfilling.  That's OK, of course.  A good report will cause you to have more questions, not fewer.

So I went off to the IPEDS data center and downloaded data to look for myself.  My methodology is a little different than CHE's (I included all colleges, whereas they excluded some smaller institutions).  While the overall results are similar, the nuances--those things you find between the cracks are more interesting and compelling, and, I think, frankly surprising.

The visualization below has six views, and it was hard keeping it to six.  Use the tabs across the top to navigate.  But before you dive in, consider supporting my webhosting and other costs at this link, if you use this information in your job (excluding high school counselors, who should always consider this a part of my service to the profession).  I appreciate your support and it keeps HEDS free for everyone.

Overview by type is static, and just shows the highest level trends in overall headcount enrollment by broad categories.

Overview is more detailed and shows changes by sector: 2019 and 2020 enrollments, on the bar charts, and numeric and percentage change in text.  You can select a state or ethnicities to drill down.  As always, if you get stuck, you can hit the reset arrow (the arrow pointing to the line on its left) to reset.

Grid view gets a little more detailed.  It starts at the highest level, showing the intersection of Sector and Ethnicity.  For instance, you'll see that American Indian or Alaska Natives enrolled at four-year publics (top left box) dropped 2,515 students, or -5.2%.  Note that I use IPEDS labels for ethnicity where possible.

State view aggregates to each individual state, but you can drill down with the filters.  The bars are colored by region.

By Ethnicity breaks out enrollment at the top level by ethnicity, and then allows you to drill farther if you'd like.  A couple of easy surprises for you: Asian enrollment overall went up in 2020, by 0.3%.  While Hispanic enrollment dropped by 3.2%, click on the sector and choose only four-year publics, and see that it went up 2.15 at those institutions. 

Individual Colleges allows you to select and compare individual institutions (I recommend no more than 12 for clarity).  I've started the view for you with a dozen large, public universities.  Use the boxes to de-select and add more.  (Hint: Type any part of the name in the filter's box after clicking, and then hit enter.  You'll see the results of a wildcard match, so typing "louis" will get you a list that includes Louisiana State and Saint Louis U.)  Note that because prior years data for Penn State breaks out enrollment by campus and now the system reports as one, there might be a few confusing points.  I've rolled the old Penn State Main Campus and The Pennsylvania State University into one, called "Penn State Main Campus.)

Two other notes: This is IPEDS Preliminary 2020 data, and might change when the final release comes out.  And, while 2019 was of course the onset of the pandemic, it's not prudent to assume all enrollment change was driven by COVID-19.  Community college enrollment, down almost 11% from 2019 to 2020, has been falling steadily since at least 2010, from 6.2M in 2010 to 5.3M in 2019.


So, happy clicking. If you see something interesting, let me know.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Baccalaureate origins of doctoral recipients

Here's a little data for you: 61 years of it, to be precise.  The National Science Foundation publishes its data on US doctoral recipients sliced a variety of ways, including some non-restricted public use files that are aggregated at a high level to protect privacy. The interface is a little quirky, and if you're doing large sets, you need to break it into pieces (this was three extracts of about 20 years each), but it may be worth your time to dive in. I merged the data set with my mega table of IPEDS data, which allows you to look at institutions on a more granular level:  It's not surprising to find that University of Washington graduates have earned more degrees than graduates of Whitman College, for instance.  So, you can filter the data by Carnegie type, region or state, or control, for instance; or you can look at all 61 years, or any range of years between 1958 and 2018 and combine it with broad or specific academic fields using the controls. High school and indep

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

So you think you're going back to the SAT and ACT?

Now that almost every university in the nation has gone test-optional for the 2021 cycle out of necessity, a nagging question remains: How many will go back to requiring tests as soon as it's possible?  No one knows, but some of the announcements some colleges made sounded like the kid who only ate his green beans to get his screen time: They did it, but they sure were not happy about it.  So we have some suspicions about the usual suspects. I don't object to colleges requiring tests, of course, even though I think they're not very helpful, intrinsically biased against certain groups, and a tool of the vain.  You be you, though, and don't let me stop you. However, there is a wild card in all of this: The recent court ruling prohibiting the University of California system from even using--let alone requiring--the SAT or ACT in admissions decisions next fall.  If you remember, the Cal State system had already decided to go test blind, and of course community colleges in