Skip to main content

Higher Education Enrollment and Capacity

This week, I was tagged in a tweet by Akil Bello, asking about capacity in higher education in the US.  My first response was that there was no way to measure capacity; no one asks this in federal reporting, and any way to attempt to measure it was fraught with problems. Remember this point as I attempt to do just that.

At the same time, I've been hearing more about the decreases in college enrollment nationwide, and I've wanted to respond to them and supply some context.  So, I think I might be able to accomplish both with one post and one visualization.

On the latter point, you want to take a look at the first tab (across the top) Total Enrollment Trends. You can see that we have experienced some drop-off in total enrollment (gray line for totals and colored lines by segments). Hover over the lines to see how much they've changed from 1980 and from the prior year.  Measured against the dramatic increase over a longer period of time, the drop-off might be viewed as a blip, or as stock market watchers might call it, a "correction."  Context is important, and, of course, the Fall 2019 enrollments don't take COVID-19 into account.  You can get more specific if you take out for-profits, for instance, or only look at a particular region (the differences are quite noticeable, and tend to follow population patterns) using the filters across the top.

If you want to see trends at a single institution, you can go to the tab cleverly titled Single Institution.  Oregon State is listed first, but use the dropdown at the top to look at any institution of interest.  Hint: to keep from scrolling, type any part of the name, like "Prince" or "Stan" or "Iowa" to reduce the list before making a selection.  Look at the trend over time, and then look at the red line to see what year their maximum enrollment was or is.

Finally, the question from the esteemed Mr. Bello: There is, as I indicated, no way to measure capacity, but if you make a few assumptions, you might be able to get close.  Assume that no college has decreased capacity over the last 40 years; that they can go back to their peak enrollment.  Then, take a look at what their peak enrollment was, and assume that it's not a zero-sum game: That all institutions could, in fact, independently enroll that many regardless of what their competitors do.  Assume they want to, or would get back to that number if they could.  Assume (because my skills are not great in writing code) that every college showing enrollment data in any year is still open (which of course is wrong, but I think we can also assume that smaller institutions are the ones that have closed, and thus the numbers won't throw everything out of whack). That's what I did.

Look at the tab Maximum by Type with Selected Years: Akil's question was about capacity and the ability to expand at the most selective institutions (and, presumably, for undergraduates).  You can use the filters in any combination to look at Carnegie Types, Region, or Selectivity Bands.  This suggests that if every college returned to its historic peak capacity, we could enroll about 21.6 million undergrads and 3.9 million graduates.

New: This is the time when I normally ask people to let me know what they see.  Today I'm trying something different: If (and only if) you use this blog (or any of my blogs) in your business or personal education or betterment, you can help defray the cost of web hosting by buying me a beer. (Public high school counselors should always consider this a free resource and read without any guilt, by the way!) Just click here to do so.  


Popular posts from this blog

Baccalaureate origins of doctoral recipients

Here's a little data for you: 61 years of it, to be precise.  The National Science Foundation publishes its data on US doctoral recipients sliced a variety of ways, including some non-restricted public use files that are aggregated at a high level to protect privacy. The interface is a little quirky, and if you're doing large sets, you need to break it into pieces (this was three extracts of about 20 years each), but it may be worth your time to dive in. I merged the data set with my mega table of IPEDS data, which allows you to look at institutions on a more granular level:  It's not surprising to find that University of Washington graduates have earned more degrees than graduates of Whitman College, for instance.  So, you can filter the data by Carnegie type, region or state, or control, for instance; or you can look at all 61 years, or any range of years between 1958 and 2018 and combine it with broad or specific academic fields using the controls. High school and indep

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

So you think you're going back to the SAT and ACT?

Now that almost every university in the nation has gone test-optional for the 2021 cycle out of necessity, a nagging question remains: How many will go back to requiring tests as soon as it's possible?  No one knows, but some of the announcements some colleges made sounded like the kid who only ate his green beans to get his screen time: They did it, but they sure were not happy about it.  So we have some suspicions about the usual suspects. I don't object to colleges requiring tests, of course, even though I think they're not very helpful, intrinsically biased against certain groups, and a tool of the vain.  You be you, though, and don't let me stop you. However, there is a wild card in all of this: The recent court ruling prohibiting the University of California system from even using--let alone requiring--the SAT or ACT in admissions decisions next fall.  If you remember, the Cal State system had already decided to go test blind, and of course community colleges in