Skip to main content

Public and Private Schools and AP Exams, 2020

 A few weeks ago, I saw this Twitter thread by James Murphy, and it reminded me of something.  If you don't want to read the thread, it has to do with the seemingly enormous advantage private school students have in the admissions process at the highly rejective colleges (hat tip to Akil Bello for that term.)

What it reminded me of was the data that College Board publishes annually on AP results. It's good of them to do so, but when data is published in massive spreadsheets, the conspiracy theorist in me starts to wonder if there isn't an attempt to claim transparency while attempting obfuscate the patterns.  Even if you manage to download the data, the tables are formatted for printing, not analysis, and it's sliced and diced in ways that make it impossible to do a lot of the detailed analysis you'd might like.

But what we have is what we got.  And what I chose to look at today were the tabs that broke out performance on AP exams by test and ethnicity and school type (that is, public or private).  Sort of.  College Board provides a tab for "all students" and a tab for "public school students" so if you want to figure out the private school data, it takes a bit of time (and my assumption is that there are only two types of schools, and if you're not in a public, you are in a private, which includes home-schooled students, I suspect).  Time I just happened to have this week in the late evenings.

There are four views here: The first shows mean AP scores for test takers by ethnicity, broken out by public school (blue) and private school (purple) students.  On the right is the number of exams taken.  If you want to look at a specific score (for instance, US History) you can use the control at the top to filter to just those results.

The second shows the public/private percentage break downs for each exam. What's up with Latin?  Surprising/not surprising.  If  you want to look at just a cluster of exams (math and computer science, for instance), or a range of scores, you can use the filters to get those views.  Go ahead and interact; you won't break anything.

The averages from the first view are interesting, of course.  But distributions are more compelling, I think, so I visualized those on the third view. The come broken out by ethnicity, and you can filter to AP score, subject, or school type.  Watch the patterns change as you click.

Finally, the fourth view shows 100% rows by score, broken out by ethnicity.  For instance, of all the students who got a score of 3, 52.38% were White, and 19.06% were Hispanic/Latino.  If you want to look at just one subject, or either school type, the filters are your friends.  The row at the very bottom shows all the results for all of the scores selected.

As always, I'm eager to hear what you see or notice here. Drop me a note if something jumps out at you.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

On Rankings, 1911, and Economic Mobility

If you're alive today, you have lived your whole life with college rankings.  Yes, even you.  You may not have knows you were living in the time of college rankings, but indeed, you have been, unless you were born before 1911 (or maybe earlier.)  If you're interested, you can read this Twitter thread from 2020 where I discuss them and include snippets of those 1911 rankings as well as those from 1957, written by Chesley Manly. You can read for yourself, or you can trust me, that in fact the rankings as we know them have been surprisingly consistent over time, and most people would have only minor quibbles with the ratings from 1911.  Perhaps that's because they have always tended to measure the same thing. But what if we did different rankings?  No, not like the Princeton Review where they make an attempt to measure best party school, or best cafeteria food, or worst social life.  Something more quantifiable and concrete, although still, admittedly, a hard thing to get rig

Freshman Migration, 1986 to 2020

(Note: I discovered that in IPEDS, Penn State Main Campus now reports with "The Pennsylvania State University" as one system.  So when you'd look at things over time, Penn State would have data until 2018, and then The Penn....etc would show up in 2020.  I found out Penn State main campus still reports its own data on the website, so I went there, and edited the IPEDS data by hand.  So if you noticed that error, it should be corrected now, but I'm not sure what I'll do in years going forward.) Freshman migration to and from the states is always a favorite visualization of mine, both because I find it a compelling and interesting topic, and because I had a few breakthroughs with calculated variables the first time I tried to do it. If you're a loyal reader, you know what this shows: The number of freshman and their movement between the states.  And if you're a loyal viewer and you use this for your work in your business, please consider supporting the costs