Skip to main content

Let's talk about library books

This post had two inspirations: First, I was scrolling around the IPEDS data center one night, looking for something to visualize that I hadn't before that I thought would be interesting. I scrolled through all the variables, and found the Academic Libraries section.  I was certain that I had never even looked at the data, so put it in the back of my mind.

The second thing that led me to this data was thinking about my discussions with high school counselors after they come back from campus tours: Just how often they've heard the same things from tour guides who are quite convinced the counselors have never heard it before (the blue safety lights comes to mind, along with the perfunctory mention of the number of books in the library.)

The latter is not an unimportant statistic, of course, as the library has long been at the heart of the intellectual life of an institution dedicated to intellectual pursuits.  But what do those numbers mean?  Are comparisons between institutions different?  And, as I've been asked more than once, "How many books can you read in four years?'

So, this.

There are three views here, all interactive and accessible via the tabs across the top.  The first shows library volumes from 2006 to 2018 (not every year has data for "physical books" as IPEDS calls them), along with three measures of change over time. Look at it by single institution, Carnegie Types, or Control to see what's happened since 2006.  As you can see, overall the number of volumes has fallen by almost 25%; but America's colleges and universities collectively still own about two books for every person in the US.

The second view shows every institution in the US and its number of books in 2006 (gray bar) and 2018 (purple bar).  Hover over the bar to see the values and the change over time.

And the third view, while the simplest, is the most intriguing to me, as it may go to institutional strategy.  Note that UCLA has added just under 5 million volumes in 12 years, which works out to just over 1,100 volumes every day over twelve years, including weekends and holidays. At the other end of the spectrum, look at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: It's gone in the exact opposite direction and has reduced its collection by almost that same amount.

There are probably stories there, or maybe reminders about anchoring fallacies, or bad assumptions that the two libraries were both appropriately sized in 2006.  Or it could be a definitional one, although IPEDS makes it pretty clear what a "book" is.  It may be a shift to electronic media; or it could be that they're acquiring the same number of books, but UIUC is disposing of older books more rapidly.

What I don't know about running a library would fill a library.  So, as always, don't make any rash decisions about your university based on what you see here.  Higher Ed Data Stories is for fun and entertainment only.

Dig in, click around, and enjoy.  And as always, let me know what you come up with.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

On Rankings, 1911, and Economic Mobility

If you're alive today, you have lived your whole life with college rankings.  Yes, even you.  You may not have knows you were living in the time of college rankings, but indeed, you have been, unless you were born before 1911 (or maybe earlier.)  If you're interested, you can read this Twitter thread from 2020 where I discuss them and include snippets of those 1911 rankings as well as those from 1957, written by Chesley Manly. You can read for yourself, or you can trust me, that in fact the rankings as we know them have been surprisingly consistent over time, and most people would have only minor quibbles with the ratings from 1911.  Perhaps that's because they have always tended to measure the same thing. But what if we did different rankings?  No, not like the Princeton Review where they make an attempt to measure best party school, or best cafeteria food, or worst social life.  Something more quantifiable and concrete, although still, admittedly, a hard thing to get rig

Freshman Migration, 1986 to 2020

(Note: I discovered that in IPEDS, Penn State Main Campus now reports with "The Pennsylvania State University" as one system.  So when you'd look at things over time, Penn State would have data until 2018, and then The Penn....etc would show up in 2020.  I found out Penn State main campus still reports its own data on the website, so I went there, and edited the IPEDS data by hand.  So if you noticed that error, it should be corrected now, but I'm not sure what I'll do in years going forward.) Freshman migration to and from the states is always a favorite visualization of mine, both because I find it a compelling and interesting topic, and because I had a few breakthroughs with calculated variables the first time I tried to do it. If you're a loyal reader, you know what this shows: The number of freshman and their movement between the states.  And if you're a loyal viewer and you use this for your work in your business, please consider supporting the costs