Skip to main content

So you think you're going back to the SAT and ACT?

Now that almost every university in the nation has gone test-optional for the 2021 cycle out of necessity, a nagging question remains: How many will go back to requiring tests as soon as it's possible?  No one knows, but some of the announcements some colleges made sounded like the kid who only ate his green beans to get his screen time: They did it, but they sure were not happy about it.  So we have some suspicions about the usual suspects.

I don't object to colleges requiring tests, of course, even though I think they're not very helpful, intrinsically biased against certain groups, and a tool of the vain.  You be you, though, and don't let me stop you.

However, there is a wild card in all of this: The recent court ruling prohibiting the University of California system from even using--let alone requiring--the SAT or ACT in admissions decisions next fall.  If you remember, the Cal State system had already decided to go test blind, and of course community colleges in the state have never required tests.  When combined with the previous announcements about the UC plans, the state of Oregon going permanently test-optional, and Washington not far behind, we may never see another test requirement at public university on the west coast.

A lot of people have no sense of the size of California. Los Angeles county has more residents than 43 of the US states.  About one out of every eleven college students in the US goes to college at a California Community College. About 10% of all students in the US enrolling as a freshman in a four-year college in the US in 2018 came from California.  It's a big deal.

And California is a big deal for colleges outside of California, too.  In 2018, over 36,000 California students attended over 1,200 four-year colleges nationwide.  Another 135,000 stayed in state at four-year colleges.

And if most of them don't need a standardized test, guess what?  They're going to start wondering why they should take it if they want to consider going out-of-state.  But you're going to require them for your applicants?  I wouldn't want to be a private university in California or a neighboring state and make the switch back. 

A few places will be able to get by with it.  You probably won't.  Let's go to the data, shall we?

This is a pretty simple visualization.  It starts with California exports, and shows the number of students leaving California to go to each state, all of which are arrayed on two scales: How many students from California enrolled, and how many colleges they enrolled in.  Hover over a dot to see the details.  Click on the dot to see which colleges enrolled how many students in 2018 (or any year you select). Use the highlighter to find your state.

As you look at this view, notice the big destinations for California students, and note how many of them are permanently test-optional, too.  That's going to depress test takers, and thus test centers, even more, I believe.

Now, click on another state using the filter.  Try Massachusetts, for instance.  Notice how many Massachusetts students go to California, and how many of those attend public universities.  See the trickle effect?

It will be interesting.  If you think you want to go back to tests as soon as you can, ask yourself this: Is my university's market position strong enough to demand them?  Even if there are far fewer test centers?  And if it is, can I lose some substantial percentage of my California applications and maintain that other vanity value, selectivity?

I know EM people don't always make this call, but you should be leading discussions like this on your campus.  Your job may depend on it.  Start with the numbers, and go from there.

Note: I almost never do requests, but I did add two views to this, based on a comment I received.  Dashboard two shows the colleges outside of California with at least 200 freshmen from the state in 2018; Dashboard three shows the colleges outside of California with at least 10% of their freshman class from the state.

Reminder: I appreciate support for webhosting and other costs associated with creating Higher Ed Data Stories.  You can support these efforts here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

On Rankings, 1911, and Economic Mobility

If you're alive today, you have lived your whole life with college rankings.  Yes, even you.  You may not have knows you were living in the time of college rankings, but indeed, you have been, unless you were born before 1911 (or maybe earlier.)  If you're interested, you can read this Twitter thread from 2020 where I discuss them and include snippets of those 1911 rankings as well as those from 1957, written by Chesley Manly. You can read for yourself, or you can trust me, that in fact the rankings as we know them have been surprisingly consistent over time, and most people would have only minor quibbles with the ratings from 1911.  Perhaps that's because they have always tended to measure the same thing. But what if we did different rankings?  No, not like the Princeton Review where they make an attempt to measure best party school, or best cafeteria food, or worst social life.  Something more quantifiable and concrete, although still, admittedly, a hard thing to get rig

Freshman Migration, 1986 to 2020

(Note: I discovered that in IPEDS, Penn State Main Campus now reports with "The Pennsylvania State University" as one system.  So when you'd look at things over time, Penn State would have data until 2018, and then The Penn....etc would show up in 2020.  I found out Penn State main campus still reports its own data on the website, so I went there, and edited the IPEDS data by hand.  So if you noticed that error, it should be corrected now, but I'm not sure what I'll do in years going forward.) Freshman migration to and from the states is always a favorite visualization of mine, both because I find it a compelling and interesting topic, and because I had a few breakthroughs with calculated variables the first time I tried to do it. If you're a loyal reader, you know what this shows: The number of freshman and their movement between the states.  And if you're a loyal viewer and you use this for your work in your business, please consider supporting the costs