Skip to main content

A multi-dimensional look at diversity in American colleges and universities

I bought another camera, so I had hoped to spend the weekend out and about doing some photography, but this weekend is one of those rare ones in the Pacific Northwest where the temperature is cracking 100° F.  So I decided to stay inside, for the most part, and take a look at a data set I had downloaded for some others at the university.

My original intent in doing this was to refresh the visualization I had done on Simpson's Diversity Index.  It's the way an ecologist looks at the diversity of an eco-system, and it puts the question in a new light: If you select two students from the population, what are the chances they'll be different along a specified dimension, in this case, ethnicity?  The first time I did it, I calculated the index at the institution level in Excel, then imported the data into Tableau.  That works, but you can't look at the data in any way other than by institution.  So, if I wanted to look at states, or regions, or public or private universities in aggregate, I'd have to write the formulae in Tableau.

I failed miserably.  The formula is pretty straightforward, but coding it is not so simple. 

So I thought the better of it, and started looking at it in ways that were more traditional.  What we have is the visualization, below.

There are three views of the data.  The first is a simple series of bar charts, showing percent of total enrollment in the group six ways: By five ethnicities individually, and by total under-represented students.  You can filter on Carnegie type or control, or limit the views by certain states.  The bars are colored by regions.

The second view looks at institutions by state, and how diverse their undergraduate enrollment is.  Choose a state (it starts with Colorado.)  Then decide how many of the top x institutions by undergraduate enrollment) you want to see.  Maybe you want the top 10, or the bottom 15, or the middle 20.  It's up to you.  Use the slider to your heart's content. The bars are 100% bars.

At the bottom of this view is a stacked bar chart of the residents aged 17-25 of that state by ethnicity.  You can see what percentage fall into the five large census categories (which are not identical to college reporting categories) for reference.  College reporting includes three categories (the gray sections) not reported in census data: Non-resident aliens (international students), students reporting two or more races (this data is available in the census, but not in a single table), and "unknown."  You can eliminate them from the view if you wish by clicking the boxes in the filter.  Note that if you do eliminate them from the view, the new percents of total only apply to those who are in the set.

Finally, the last view allows you to find schools by combining the enrollment profiles for each specific ethnicity (of the four largest).  So, if you want to find  the colleges that are at least 10% African-American (n = 745) , you can do that.  If you want to find the ones that are at least 40% Hispanic (92), just pull the sliders.

They also work in combination.  So, if you want to find institutions that are at least 15% Asian and 35% white, you can do that, too (there are 46, by the way).  When using the filters, I find it easier to just type in the box.  Enter the numbers as decimals (for instance, 12% is .12).

What do you see? What surprised you?  I'd love to hear.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Baccalaureate origins of doctoral recipients

Here's a little data for you: 61 years of it, to be precise.  The National Science Foundation publishes its data on US doctoral recipients sliced a variety of ways, including some non-restricted public use files that are aggregated at a high level to protect privacy. The interface is a little quirky, and if you're doing large sets, you need to break it into pieces (this was three extracts of about 20 years each), but it may be worth your time to dive in. I merged the data set with my mega table of IPEDS data, which allows you to look at institutions on a more granular level:  It's not surprising to find that University of Washington graduates have earned more degrees than graduates of Whitman College, for instance.  So, you can filter the data by Carnegie type, region or state, or control, for instance; or you can look at all 61 years, or any range of years between 1958 and 2018 and combine it with broad or specific academic fields using the controls. High school and indep

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

So you think you're going back to the SAT and ACT?

Now that almost every university in the nation has gone test-optional for the 2021 cycle out of necessity, a nagging question remains: How many will go back to requiring tests as soon as it's possible?  No one knows, but some of the announcements some colleges made sounded like the kid who only ate his green beans to get his screen time: They did it, but they sure were not happy about it.  So we have some suspicions about the usual suspects. I don't object to colleges requiring tests, of course, even though I think they're not very helpful, intrinsically biased against certain groups, and a tool of the vain.  You be you, though, and don't let me stop you. However, there is a wild card in all of this: The recent court ruling prohibiting the University of California system from even using--let alone requiring--the SAT or ACT in admissions decisions next fall.  If you remember, the Cal State system had already decided to go test blind, and of course community colleges in