Skip to main content

A multi-dimensional look at diversity in American colleges and universities

I bought another camera, so I had hoped to spend the weekend out and about doing some photography, but this weekend is one of those rare ones in the Pacific Northwest where the temperature is cracking 100° F.  So I decided to stay inside, for the most part, and take a look at a data set I had downloaded for some others at the university.

My original intent in doing this was to refresh the visualization I had done on Simpson's Diversity Index.  It's the way an ecologist looks at the diversity of an eco-system, and it puts the question in a new light: If you select two students from the population, what are the chances they'll be different along a specified dimension, in this case, ethnicity?  The first time I did it, I calculated the index at the institution level in Excel, then imported the data into Tableau.  That works, but you can't look at the data in any way other than by institution.  So, if I wanted to look at states, or regions, or public or private universities in aggregate, I'd have to write the formulae in Tableau.

I failed miserably.  The formula is pretty straightforward, but coding it is not so simple. 

So I thought the better of it, and started looking at it in ways that were more traditional.  What we have is the visualization, below.

There are three views of the data.  The first is a simple series of bar charts, showing percent of total enrollment in the group six ways: By five ethnicities individually, and by total under-represented students.  You can filter on Carnegie type or control, or limit the views by certain states.  The bars are colored by regions.

The second view looks at institutions by state, and how diverse their undergraduate enrollment is.  Choose a state (it starts with Colorado.)  Then decide how many of the top x institutions by undergraduate enrollment) you want to see.  Maybe you want the top 10, or the bottom 15, or the middle 20.  It's up to you.  Use the slider to your heart's content. The bars are 100% bars.

At the bottom of this view is a stacked bar chart of the residents aged 17-25 of that state by ethnicity.  You can see what percentage fall into the five large census categories (which are not identical to college reporting categories) for reference.  College reporting includes three categories (the gray sections) not reported in census data: Non-resident aliens (international students), students reporting two or more races (this data is available in the census, but not in a single table), and "unknown."  You can eliminate them from the view if you wish by clicking the boxes in the filter.  Note that if you do eliminate them from the view, the new percents of total only apply to those who are in the set.

Finally, the last view allows you to find schools by combining the enrollment profiles for each specific ethnicity (of the four largest).  So, if you want to find  the colleges that are at least 10% African-American (n = 745) , you can do that.  If you want to find the ones that are at least 40% Hispanic (92), just pull the sliders.

They also work in combination.  So, if you want to find institutions that are at least 15% Asian and 35% white, you can do that, too (there are 46, by the way).  When using the filters, I find it easier to just type in the box.  Enter the numbers as decimals (for instance, 12% is .12).

What do you see? What surprised you?  I'd love to hear.


Popular posts from this blog

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

Freshman Migration, 1986 to 2020

(Note: I discovered that in IPEDS, Penn State Main Campus now reports with "The Pennsylvania State University" as one system.  So when you'd look at things over time, Penn State would have data until 2018, and then The Penn....etc would show up in 2020.  I found out Penn State main campus still reports its own data on the website, so I went there, and edited the IPEDS data by hand.  So if you noticed that error, it should be corrected now, but I'm not sure what I'll do in years going forward.) Freshman migration to and from the states is always a favorite visualization of mine, both because I find it a compelling and interesting topic, and because I had a few breakthroughs with calculated variables the first time I tried to do it. If you're a loyal reader, you know what this shows: The number of freshman and their movement between the states.  And if you're a loyal viewer and you use this for your work in your business, please consider supporting the costs

Doctoral recipients by bachelor's degree-granting institution, 2016-2020

Each time I publish this visualization I get a lot of traffic on the site, and I can see why. It shows all doctoral recipients (in 2016-2020) broken out by where they received their bachelor's degrees.  So, for instance, the top level view shows that UC Berkeley is the alma mater of more doctoral recipients than any other institution, followed by The University of Michigan and Cornell University. That would be interesting, but of course, these are large institutions, and it's natural to think lots of graduates will lead to lots of doctoral degrees.  No surprise there. So the visualization allows you to look at the types of colleges you or your students might want: Select a state, select public or private, select by Carnegie type if you wish.  You can also look at HBCUs if you'd like.  Most important, you can filter by doctoral degree, so if you want to see which institution sends the most students to doctorates in chemistry, you can do so. To head off the questions I get ev