Skip to main content

2018 AP Scores by State and Ethnicity

The College Board data on AP scores is now available for 2018, but it's hard to make sense of in a macro sense.  The data are in 51 different workbooks, and, depending on how you want to slice and dice the data, as many as eight worksheets per workbook.  What's more, is the data structure; they're designed to print on paper, for those who want to dive into one little piece of the big picture at a time.

So before going any farther, I'd like us all to challenge the College Board and ACT to put out their data in formats that make exploring data easier for everyone. Unless, of course, they really don't want to do that.

I downloaded all 51 workbooks and extracted the actual data using EasyMorph, then pulled it into Tableau for visualization and publication. There are four views here.

The first tab is a simple scattergram, which may be enough: The relationship between a state's median income and the average AP exam score.  While blunt, it points out once again that we as a nation reward achievement in admissions (rather than merit) and that achievement is easier when you have more resources.  Filter by ethnicity or specific exam, and use the highlighters to show a state or region.

Tab two is a map, with average scores color coded.  Again, you see higher scores (orange and brown) in places where parental attainment and income are higher.  Again, two filters for you to drill down.

Tab three shows differences for any group by grade level and gender. It might be surprising to find that 11th graders generally score higher than 12th graders, until you realize that accomplished, driven children of successful parents load up on AP courses early to help with college applications.  But, given that girls have higher grades in high school than boys, you might also be surprised by the higher scores boys usually post in AP.  By the way, the young women go on to earn higher grades in college too, so wonder about that for a while.

The fourth tab shows score distributions two ways: On the left, with scores of 4 and 5 to the right, assuming 4 is generally the cutoff for college credit; since some of the groups are small (like Italian, for instance), I also put a stacked 100% bar on the right.  The Exam Groups filter at upper right clusters the tests by type (Science, Languages, etc.).

We all know that it is a good thing for students to work hard and challenge themselves in high school, but we also know--ceteris paribus--schools with more resources help prepare students for these exams better. As you look through these visualizations, I recommend you look at groups most underserved in our country, and ask whether the promise of AP has been delivered yet.

This data set is complicated as would need some explanation to manipulate, but I'll make the restructured version available to anyone in higher ed who wants it, via email to jon.boeckenstedt@depaul.edu




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

On Rankings, 1911, and Economic Mobility

If you're alive today, you have lived your whole life with college rankings.  Yes, even you.  You may not have knows you were living in the time of college rankings, but indeed, you have been, unless you were born before 1911 (or maybe earlier.)  If you're interested, you can read this Twitter thread from 2020 where I discuss them and include snippets of those 1911 rankings as well as those from 1957, written by Chesley Manly. You can read for yourself, or you can trust me, that in fact the rankings as we know them have been surprisingly consistent over time, and most people would have only minor quibbles with the ratings from 1911.  Perhaps that's because they have always tended to measure the same thing. But what if we did different rankings?  No, not like the Princeton Review where they make an attempt to measure best party school, or best cafeteria food, or worst social life.  Something more quantifiable and concrete, although still, admittedly, a hard thing to get rig

Freshman Migration, 1986 to 2020

(Note: I discovered that in IPEDS, Penn State Main Campus now reports with "The Pennsylvania State University" as one system.  So when you'd look at things over time, Penn State would have data until 2018, and then The Penn....etc would show up in 2020.  I found out Penn State main campus still reports its own data on the website, so I went there, and edited the IPEDS data by hand.  So if you noticed that error, it should be corrected now, but I'm not sure what I'll do in years going forward.) Freshman migration to and from the states is always a favorite visualization of mine, both because I find it a compelling and interesting topic, and because I had a few breakthroughs with calculated variables the first time I tried to do it. If you're a loyal reader, you know what this shows: The number of freshman and their movement between the states.  And if you're a loyal viewer and you use this for your work in your business, please consider supporting the costs