Skip to main content

2018 AP Scores by State and Ethnicity

The College Board data on AP scores is now available for 2018, but it's hard to make sense of in a macro sense.  The data are in 51 different workbooks, and, depending on how you want to slice and dice the data, as many as eight worksheets per workbook.  What's more, is the data structure; they're designed to print on paper, for those who want to dive into one little piece of the big picture at a time.

So before going any farther, I'd like us all to challenge the College Board and ACT to put out their data in formats that make exploring data easier for everyone. Unless, of course, they really don't want to do that.

I downloaded all 51 workbooks and extracted the actual data using EasyMorph, then pulled it into Tableau for visualization and publication. There are four views here.

The first tab is a simple scattergram, which may be enough: The relationship between a state's median income and the average AP exam score.  While blunt, it points out once again that we as a nation reward achievement in admissions (rather than merit) and that achievement is easier when you have more resources.  Filter by ethnicity or specific exam, and use the highlighters to show a state or region.

Tab two is a map, with average scores color coded.  Again, you see higher scores (orange and brown) in places where parental attainment and income are higher.  Again, two filters for you to drill down.

Tab three shows differences for any group by grade level and gender. It might be surprising to find that 11th graders generally score higher than 12th graders, until you realize that accomplished, driven children of successful parents load up on AP courses early to help with college applications.  But, given that girls have higher grades in high school than boys, you might also be surprised by the higher scores boys usually post in AP.  By the way, the young women go on to earn higher grades in college too, so wonder about that for a while.

The fourth tab shows score distributions two ways: On the left, with scores of 4 and 5 to the right, assuming 4 is generally the cutoff for college credit; since some of the groups are small (like Italian, for instance), I also put a stacked 100% bar on the right.  The Exam Groups filter at upper right clusters the tests by type (Science, Languages, etc.).

We all know that it is a good thing for students to work hard and challenge themselves in high school, but we also know--ceteris paribus--schools with more resources help prepare students for these exams better. As you look through these visualizations, I recommend you look at groups most underserved in our country, and ask whether the promise of AP has been delivered yet.

This data set is complicated as would need some explanation to manipulate, but I'll make the restructured version available to anyone in higher ed who wants it, via email to jon.boeckenstedt@depaul.edu




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Baccalaureate origins of doctoral recipients

Here's a little data for you: 61 years of it, to be precise.  The National Science Foundation publishes its data on US doctoral recipients sliced a variety of ways, including some non-restricted public use files that are aggregated at a high level to protect privacy. The interface is a little quirky, and if you're doing large sets, you need to break it into pieces (this was three extracts of about 20 years each), but it may be worth your time to dive in. I merged the data set with my mega table of IPEDS data, which allows you to look at institutions on a more granular level:  It's not surprising to find that University of Washington graduates have earned more degrees than graduates of Whitman College, for instance.  So, you can filter the data by Carnegie type, region or state, or control, for instance; or you can look at all 61 years, or any range of years between 1958 and 2018 and combine it with broad or specific academic fields using the controls. High school and indep

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

So you think you're going back to the SAT and ACT?

Now that almost every university in the nation has gone test-optional for the 2021 cycle out of necessity, a nagging question remains: How many will go back to requiring tests as soon as it's possible?  No one knows, but some of the announcements some colleges made sounded like the kid who only ate his green beans to get his screen time: They did it, but they sure were not happy about it.  So we have some suspicions about the usual suspects. I don't object to colleges requiring tests, of course, even though I think they're not very helpful, intrinsically biased against certain groups, and a tool of the vain.  You be you, though, and don't let me stop you. However, there is a wild card in all of this: The recent court ruling prohibiting the University of California system from even using--let alone requiring--the SAT or ACT in admissions decisions next fall.  If you remember, the Cal State system had already decided to go test blind, and of course community colleges in