Skip to main content

Story Telling With Data Challenge

I've often seen the challenges issued by Cole Knaflic on the Story Telling With Data website, and found the most recent one, creation of a scatterplot, to be too tempting to pass up. I used Tableau to create it, and yes, I've written about this before.

This is IPEDS data, from Fall of 2015 (the most recent complete set available).  It shows the strong correlation between standardized test scores and income.  And I think it shows something else, too.

On the x-axis, choose SAT or ACT scores (depending on your comfort) to see how higher scores translate into fewer lower-income students (as measured by eligibility for Pell Grants).  The bubbles are color-coded by control, and sized by selectivity (that is, the percentage of freshman applications accepted.)  Highly selective institutions are coded as larger bubbles, and less selective as smaller bubbles.

Note the cluster of private, highly selective institutions at the lower right: Most of these constitutions are among the nation's wealthiest, yet they enroll the lowest percentages of low-income students.  And, at the same time, they deny admission to the greatest numbers of students.  I presume they had many low-income students among those who were not offered admission.

Causality is complex, of course, and tests measure and vary with social capital, opportunity, and student investment as well as income and ethnicity. But this is one of those instances where a single picture tells the whole story, I think.  What about you?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

Freshman Migration, 1986 to 2020

(Note: I discovered that in IPEDS, Penn State Main Campus now reports with "The Pennsylvania State University" as one system.  So when you'd look at things over time, Penn State would have data until 2018, and then The Penn....etc would show up in 2020.  I found out Penn State main campus still reports its own data on the website, so I went there, and edited the IPEDS data by hand.  So if you noticed that error, it should be corrected now, but I'm not sure what I'll do in years going forward.) Freshman migration to and from the states is always a favorite visualization of mine, both because I find it a compelling and interesting topic, and because I had a few breakthroughs with calculated variables the first time I tried to do it. If you're a loyal reader, you know what this shows: The number of freshman and their movement between the states.  And if you're a loyal viewer and you use this for your work in your business, please consider supporting the costs

Yes, your yield rate is still falling, v 2020

I started doing this post on a regular basis several years ago, in response (if I recall) to a colleague talking about their Board of Trustees Chair insisting that "all we need to do" to bring enrollment back to its former level is to get the yield rate up.   That's the equivalent of saying all you need to do is straighten your drives and cut ten putts from each round, and you'll be a great golfer.  Moreover, it's based on the assumption that a falling yield rate is based on something you're doing or not doing.  The challenge is much larger, and a lot harder to address.  It's not a switch you flip. So we've got this: A look at applications, admits, and enrolls over the last twenty years, and three key ratios that are based on those numbers: Admit rate, or the percentage of applicants offered admission; yield rate, or the percentage of those offered admission who enroll; and the lesser-known draw rate, which is calculated by dividing the yield rate by t