Skip to main content

My homage to the Atlas of the Census

In eighth grade, a teacher introduced my class to the Statistical Abstract of the United States, and it changed the way I looked at numbers and information.  Of course, in those days, it was just a book, and very hard to interact with.  But I still remember poring over it, absorbing interesting, if arcane, facts about the country and its regions.  Ever since, I've been fascinated with reference books like it.

Then, sometime about 2005, I came across the Census Atlas of the United States, and my mind was blown even more.  It contains page after page of maps, representing gobs of data, visualized in a way that tells stories, sometimes with a single picture.  One map, especially, made an impression on me. It's in this chapter, page 14 of the chapter, page 40 of the book, showing Prevalent Asian Group, by county.  If you can't download that large .pdf file, it's below:


In my job, and in higher education in general, we think about race and ethnicity a lot, of course, but here was something that exploded and challenged the status quo and made me think differently: "Asian," was not a monolithic term.  Far from it.

That day, I bought a copy of the Atlas, and always pick it up when I see it.  It's astonishing, I think, and I still discover something new every time I spend some time with it.

I've wanted to do my own mini-version for a long time, but the thing that makes it hard is getting at Census Bureau data.  It's either very hard to extract, or rolled up in ways that don't inspire further analysis.  But I did come across a file that was accessible and fairly easy to work with, with data on a lot of factors at the US county level.  And I started working on it.

This includes 19 maps: The first 16 show US counties, colored by the variable indicated.  In the heading is the US average.  For instance, about 66.2% of the US population is "White alone."  All maps are color coded with that center value as the center point.  Check the legend.

You can look at the whole US or just a state; unfortunately, adding Alaska and Hawaii makes it hard and time consuming to get the maps to look good.  If you have Tableau, you can download this and look at it yourself.

The maps have data filters on them too.  So if  you're looking at the view with percent of adults with a high school diploma, for instance, you can pull the slider up or down to show only those counties with very high or very low values.  On each map, I've also added a somewhat-random second slider, so you can see combinations of variables.  On the high school graduates one, for instance, you can also look at population density.  See which counties have high/high, high/low, or low/low combinations. Play around.

Additionally, there are three other views: Two showing 2012 presidential election results, and one scatter-gram, where you can cross any two variables, and see the relationships between them.

If you work in my job, you might find interesting data that can help you understand how--and why--your distant markets are different than your local ones.  Or maybe it's just fun to play with.

Either way, I hope you enjoy it.  I'd love to hear what you discover.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2018 Admissions Data

This is always a popular post, it seems, and I've had a couple of people already ask when it was going to be out.  Wait no more. This is IPEDS 2018 admissions data, visualized for you in two different ways.  You can switch using the tabs across the top. The first view is the universe of colleges and universities that report data; not every college is required to, and a few leave data out, and test optional colleges are not supposed to report test scores.  But IPEDS is not perfect, so if you find any problems, contact the college. On the first view, you'll see 1,359 four-year private and public, not-for-profit institutions displayed.  In order to make this as clean as possible, I've taken out some specialty schools (nursing, business, engineering, etc.) as many of those don't have complete data.  But you can put them back in using the filter at top right. Hover over any bar, and a little chart pops up showing undergraduate enrollment by ethnicity. You can also

So you think you're going back to the SAT and ACT?

Now that almost every university in the nation has gone test-optional for the 2021 cycle out of necessity, a nagging question remains: How many will go back to requiring tests as soon as it's possible?  No one knows, but some of the announcements some colleges made sounded like the kid who only ate his green beans to get his screen time: They did it, but they sure were not happy about it.  So we have some suspicions about the usual suspects. I don't object to colleges requiring tests, of course, even though I think they're not very helpful, intrinsically biased against certain groups, and a tool of the vain.  You be you, though, and don't let me stop you. However, there is a wild card in all of this: The recent court ruling prohibiting the University of California system from even using--let alone requiring--the SAT or ACT in admissions decisions next fall.  If you remember, the Cal State system had already decided to go test blind, and of course community colleges in

Yes, your yield rate is still falling

In 2015, I wrote this post on falling yield rates.  It was pretty obvious to many of us in the profession that this trend was widespread, and largely driven by a dramatic increase in applications against a more modest increase in actual students who could or would enroll. It apparently wasn't so obvious to everyone.  Response was much stronger than I thought it would be, and I never had seen so many requests from people who wanted to share it with their trustees (btw, this is public; you never have to ask permission to share). So I redid it, using trend data from 2005 to 2018.  First a couple of definitions: Admit rate is the percentage of applicants who were offered admission (admits/applicants). Yield rate is the percentage of admitted students who enroll (enrollers/admits). Draw rate is not commonly known, and I wish I remember who first mentioned it to me in the 1980's.  It stuck with me and is a valuable metric, I think, as we attempt to measure market posi