Skip to main content

Looking at Catholic Colleges and Access

It's the kind of headline that grabs attention: Catholic colleges tell poor students: Go somewhere else.  And it certainly generated some discussion on Twitter and within my own university.  The article was written by Paul Moses, who is a Journalism Professor at Brooklyn College, and who seems to have a strong interest in social justice and Catholic topics, based on his tweets.

When you work at a Catholic college or university, service to the poor is something you talk about all the time.  At my own institution, where about 28% of freshmen receive the Pell Grant, we pride ourselves that the commitment is in our mission statement.  So I thought the topic deserved something more than the one-dimensional, high-level examination the article offered.

I went to IPEDS and downloaded some data, which is presented here.  To start with, I've included only private institutions, filtering to those with admission rates below 70%, as these institutions have some flexibility in shaping the freshman class, which leads to conscious choices about trade-offs other non-selective institutions don't have to make.  If you want to change that, just slide the control on the top right to suit your taste. There are 1,283 private institutions in this data set, but not all have complete data; the top view currently shows 658 after filtering, colored by religious affiliation. Hover over a dot for details. Click on the pencil in the legend to highlight one group.

Additionally, I've allowed you to filter by broad geographic region, and I think you'll find this instructive as you dive deeper into the data.

The top scatter gram arrays the institutions on two scales: The x-axis is set to the net price for students with family incomes of $30,000 or less.  Using the control in the pink box, you can change that.  The y-axis shows the percent of freshmen with Pell Grants, the grant for the neediest students in the country (usually with family incomes below $50,000.)

The bottom chart shows three views, and uses the same filters as the top view, but aggregates them to show the data by religious affiliation.  Note that because the data are limited, it's impossible to weight these statistics by enrollment, as you'd normally want to do, so this is an average of the averages, and far from perfect.  Still, the three values displayed--average net costs, average percent on Pell, and average endowment assets per FTE (full-time equivalent student)--can be instructive.

While I'd never accuse anyone from the Eastern Time Zone has having a particular bias about the rest of the country, it does appear that things vary by region; moreover, the results vary by the income band selected too. Note the differences between net price for very low income bands and other groups.  What you see across the board, and not just at Catholic colleges, is that low income students pay a lot more as a percent of family income than wealthier students.

While it's easy to select a hypothesis and cherry pick some data to support it, it's a little harder to go deeper and understand that Catholic Colleges look a lot like other private colleges when it comes to this issue.  Yes, Catholic colleges should do more.  No, they are not the only ones who should be singled out.

What's not always obvious are the resources available to do more of the lifting.  In that regard, look at the last column: Endowment assets.  What you see is that Catholic colleges are doing a lot with a little, and as I've said before, the wealthiest, most prestigious universities in the nation are not doing their fair share of the lifting.

What do you think? What do you see?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Changes in AP Scores, 2022 to 2024

Used to be, with a little work, you could download very detailed data on AP results from the College Board website: For every state, and for every course, you could see performance by ethnicity.  And, if you wanted to dig really deep, you could break out details by private and public schools, and by grade level.  I used to publish the data every couple of years. Those days are gone.  The transparency The College Board touts as a value seems to have its limits, and I understand this to some extent: Racists loved to twist the data using single-factor analysis, and that's not good for a company who is trying to make business inroads with under-represented communities as they cloak their pursuit of revenue as an altruistic push toward access. They still publish data, but as I wrote about in my last post , it's far less detailed; what's more, what is easily accessible is fairly sterile, and what's more detailed seems to be structured in a way that suggests the company doesn...

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl...

Changes in SAT Scores after Test-optional

One of the intended consequences of test-optional admission policies at some institutions prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was to raise test scores reported to US News and World Report.  It's rare that you would see a proponent of test-optional admission like me admit that, but to deny it would be foolish. Because I worked at DePaul, which was an early adopter of the approach (at least among large universities), I fielded a lot of calls from colleagues who were considering it, some of whom were explicit in their reasons for doing so.  One person I spoke to came right out at the start of the call: She was only calling, she said, because her provost wanted to know how much they could raise scores if they went test-optional. If I sensed or heard that motivation, I advised people against it.  In those days, the vast majority of students took standardized admission tests like the SAT or ACT, but the percentage of students applying without tests was still relatively small; the ne...