Skip to main content

Staffing in Public Schools in the US, 2011

A while ago, I found some interesting NCES data on teacher salaries over time Teacher Salaries; it quickly became the most popular (currently 34,000 views) and the most contentious piece I'd ever posted, and months later, it's still getting hundreds of hits a week.  I simply found the data interesting, and wasn't making any sort of political statement.  I vowed at that time to never post about teachers again, so of course I'm breaking that rule today.

This is from the 2011 Common Core of data, showing all personnel in each state who work in public primary and secondary education.  Click here to see the data table and read all the footnotes, especially if you want to argue.

There are many things that can explain this data: States that have mostly urban areas (like California and New York) are likely to have bigger schools and classrooms, and thus fewer teachers per student.  Different states with similar populations may have more district administrators if they manage schools locally, or fewer if they do it in bigger geographies (by county, for instance.)

I added a couple data pieces to the table: First, the 2010 census data of the population under 18, which is not a perfect proxy for public school enrollment, but it's probably close enough.  I used Data Ferret to extract the data, and used those figures to compute the ratios (students per teacher, for instance.)  Again, a state with a younger population (more in elementary schools) might have fewer students per teacher than one with an older population (more in secondary schools).

Second, I downloaded 2012 election results, to see if data might sort out by Republican and Democrat states.  I'm pleased to say they generally don't, as I suspect that might avoid more colorful "discussion" on the topic.  The colors are applied to all but the top tab; Republicans in red and Democrats in blue.

There are four views, with the tabs across the top.  If you want to sort any of this data by any column, just hover over the x-axis labels at the bottom and click on the little bars icon to the right of the text.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl

Freshman Migration, 1986 to 2020

(Note: I discovered that in IPEDS, Penn State Main Campus now reports with "The Pennsylvania State University" as one system.  So when you'd look at things over time, Penn State would have data until 2018, and then The Penn....etc would show up in 2020.  I found out Penn State main campus still reports its own data on the website, so I went there, and edited the IPEDS data by hand.  So if you noticed that error, it should be corrected now, but I'm not sure what I'll do in years going forward.) Freshman migration to and from the states is always a favorite visualization of mine, both because I find it a compelling and interesting topic, and because I had a few breakthroughs with calculated variables the first time I tried to do it. If you're a loyal reader, you know what this shows: The number of freshman and their movement between the states.  And if you're a loyal viewer and you use this for your work in your business, please consider supporting the costs

Yes, your yield rate is still falling, v 2020

I started doing this post on a regular basis several years ago, in response (if I recall) to a colleague talking about their Board of Trustees Chair insisting that "all we need to do" to bring enrollment back to its former level is to get the yield rate up.   That's the equivalent of saying all you need to do is straighten your drives and cut ten putts from each round, and you'll be a great golfer.  Moreover, it's based on the assumption that a falling yield rate is based on something you're doing or not doing.  The challenge is much larger, and a lot harder to address.  It's not a switch you flip. So we've got this: A look at applications, admits, and enrolls over the last twenty years, and three key ratios that are based on those numbers: Admit rate, or the percentage of applicants offered admission; yield rate, or the percentage of those offered admission who enroll; and the lesser-known draw rate, which is calculated by dividing the yield rate by t