Skip to main content

A Deeper Dive on Financial Health

Federal Student Aid, a division of the Department of Education, releases its list of colleges and universities based on Financial Responsibility (sometimes called Financial Health, which I think is more accurate.)  In general, to continue to be eligible to award your students federal financial aid, you need a score of 1.5 or above (on a three-point scale.)  The scores go down to -1.

Most presentations of the data are pretty static: A table with the data, for instance.  But I think there is a bigger story here: Where are colleges in trouble located? How many are not-for-profit? How many students do they enroll? What about Pell grant recipients and students of color? Do are they more likely to enroll in colleges with failing financial health?

So I merged some 2011 IPEDS data into the mix.  Some of the results surprise me; neither Harvard nor MIT are a 3, for instance; the Franciscan School of Theology in California, however, is.  Results like this have caused some consternation among accountants, CFOs and their professional organizations, causing them to question whether there is any value at all to these rankings.

What do you think?  There are several views of the data here, including one that allows you to look at individual institutions.  For viewing, I've rolled all the scores into 1/2 point bands, and color-coded them. Enjoy.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Educational Attainment and the Presidential Elections

I've been fascinated for a while by the connection between political leanings and education: The correlation is so strong that I once suggested that perhaps Republicans were so anti-education because, in general, places with a higher percentage of bachelor's degree recipients were more likely to vote for Democrats. The 2024 presidential election puzzled a lot of us in higher education, and perhaps these charts will show you why: We work and probably hang around mostly people with college degrees (or higher).  Our perception is limited. With the 2024 election data just out , I thought I'd take a look at the last three elections and see if the pattern I noticed in 2016 and 2020 held.  Spoiler: It did, mostly. Before you dive into this, a couple of tips: Alaska's data is always reported in a funky way, so just ignore it here.  It's a small state (in population, that is) and it's very red.  It doesn't change the overall trends even if I could figure out how to c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Changes in AP Scores, 2022 to 2024

Used to be, with a little work, you could download very detailed data on AP results from the College Board website: For every state, and for every course, you could see performance by ethnicity.  And, if you wanted to dig really deep, you could break out details by private and public schools, and by grade level.  I used to publish the data every couple of years. Those days are gone.  The transparency The College Board touts as a value seems to have its limits, and I understand this to some extent: Racists loved to twist the data using single-factor analysis, and that's not good for a company who is trying to make business inroads with under-represented communities as they cloak their pursuit of revenue as an altruistic push toward access. They still publish data, but as I wrote about in my last post , it's far less detailed; what's more, what is easily accessible is fairly sterile, and what's more detailed seems to be structured in a way that suggests the company doesn...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Highly Rejective Colleges

If you're not following Akil Bello on Twitter, you should be.  His timeline is filled with great insights about standardized testing, and he takes great effort to point out racism (both subtle and not-so-subtle) in higher education, all while throwing in references to the Knicks and his daughter Enid, making the experience interesting, compelling, and sometimes, fun. Recently, he created the term " highly rejective colleges " as a more apt description for what are otherwise called "highly selective colleges."  As I've said before, a college that admits 15% of applicants really has a rejections office, not an admissions office.  The term appears to have taken off on Twitter, and I hope it will stick. So I took a look at the highly rejectives (really, that's all I'm going to call them from now on) and found some interesting patterns in the data. Take a look:  The 1,132 four-year, private colleges and universities with admissions data in IPEDS are incl...
Post a Comment
Read more