Skip to main content

The Changing Shape of American Higher Ed Enrollment

Much has been made recently of changes in enrollment in US Higher Ed: Fewer males (is it a crisis or not?).  Shrinking enrollments.  Changes in admissions due to test optional and COVID.

In this recent piece in the Chronicle of Higher Education, I recently pointed out that one of the ways colleges stayed viable during previous enrollment shifts was to expand both physical campus locations and offerings and degree programs tailored to working adults.  So that got me thinking about the shifts in enrollment by age, something I'd not explicitly looked at before.

On the surface it may not seem that exciting, but if you dig down enough and connect the dots, you might find some interesting societal trends.  So follow along.

Before we do, if you're using this data in your professional life, either as a college EM staff member or a for-profit consultant, I appreciate your support for my time, webhosting, and software costs.  You can show support by clicking here.

Some background: Part of what you'll see here is driven by other factors.  For instance, the market in the 1970's, 80's, and 90's for "adult" education was because there were large segments of that population that did not have a bachelor's or even an associate's degree.  It was untapped potential.  As you'll see below, that opportunity is less obvious than it used to be; higher education is a victim of its own success.  And at the same time, it's still opportunistic.

There are three views here: The first, Change in enrollment by age over time shows total undergraduate enrollment on gray bars, and age break outs on the colored lines.  You can use the highlight function to provide visual emphasis to any age group.  Some interesting stuff here: The big increase in the Under 18 category, driven by dual-enrollment, certainly.  The continuing increase in 18, 19, 20, and 21 year-olds, which may be making colleges complacent.  The troubling drop-off in 22-24 year olds.  And the relative drop of "adult" students (I have always hated that term to describe students over 25, because 18-year-old freshmen are adults, even if they don't act that way.)

On this view, you can filter by Carnegie type, Control, level, or state to drill down if you'd like a smaller view.

The second view, Distribution of Enrollment, is a little less complex.  It just shows the makeup by age of undergraduate enrollment in the US over time.  Here you can really see the "young-shift" of college enrollment.  Students under 22 now make up about 60% of college enrollment; in 1987 it was under 50%.  (This is where the IR staff will remind me that we're looking at headcount, not FTE, of course.  It's very likely that the overwhelming majority of those under 18 are taking fewer credits.)

And the final view, Ages and Breakouts, allows you to get a little more granular still.  Choose an age group, and then choose a way to break out the colored lines.  Once again, you'll see actual numbers on the gray bars, and percentage changes on the lines.

What do you see that surprised you?  Drop me an email or post your comments below.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Changes in AP Scores, 2022 to 2024

Used to be, with a little work, you could download very detailed data on AP results from the College Board website: For every state, and for every course, you could see performance by ethnicity.  And, if you wanted to dig really deep, you could break out details by private and public schools, and by grade level.  I used to publish the data every couple of years. Those days are gone.  The transparency The College Board touts as a value seems to have its limits, and I understand this to some extent: Racists loved to twist the data using single-factor analysis, and that's not good for a company who is trying to make business inroads with under-represented communities as they cloak their pursuit of revenue as an altruistic push toward access. They still publish data, but as I wrote about in my last post , it's far less detailed; what's more, what is easily accessible is fairly sterile, and what's more detailed seems to be structured in a way that suggests the company doesn...
Post a Comment
Read more

Educational Attainment and the Presidential Elections

I've been fascinated for a while by the connection between political leanings and education: The correlation is so strong that I once suggested that perhaps Republicans were so anti-education because, in general, places with a higher percentage of bachelor's degree recipients were more likely to vote for Democrats. The 2024 presidential election puzzled a lot of us in higher education, and perhaps these charts will show you why: We work and probably hang around mostly people with college degrees (or higher).  Our perception is limited. With the 2024 election data just out , I thought I'd take a look at the last three elections and see if the pattern I noticed in 2016 and 2020 held.  Spoiler: It did, mostly. Before you dive into this, a couple of tips: Alaska's data is always reported in a funky way, so just ignore it here.  It's a small state (in population, that is) and it's very red.  It doesn't change the overall trends even if I could figure out how to c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Changes in SAT Scores after Test-optional

One of the intended consequences of test-optional admission policies at some institutions prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was to raise test scores reported to US News and World Report.  It's rare that you would see a proponent of test-optional admission like me admit that, but to deny it would be foolish. Because I worked at DePaul, which was an early adopter of the approach (at least among large universities), I fielded a lot of calls from colleagues who were considering it, some of whom were explicit in their reasons for doing so.  One person I spoke to came right out at the start of the call: She was only calling, she said, because her provost wanted to know how much they could raise scores if they went test-optional. If I sensed or heard that motivation, I advised people against it.  In those days, the vast majority of students took standardized admission tests like the SAT or ACT, but the percentage of students applying without tests was still relatively small; the ne...
Post a Comment
Read more