Skip to main content

Yes, your yield rate is STILL falling, version 2022

We finally got the delayed 2022 admissions data from IPEDS yesterday, and I spent the better part of the evening working on pulling this together.  Counselors, parents, students, and admissions/enrollment management officers tell me this is a helpful tool to use while thinking about the state of college admission.

There are four views here:

All institutions interactive shows admission data for all institutions who report it to IPEDS: The number of applications for the first-year class, the number of students offered admission, and the number who enrolled, shown on the bar charts at top.  Then, below, I've calculated admit rates, yield rates, and draw rates.  Admit rate is total admits/total applications; Yield rate is total enrolls/total admits.  And draw rate is yield/admit rate.

Draw rate is intended to show fake, artificially deflated admit rates.  I've written about this a lot, but essentially if you try to look more selective than you are by pumping up soft applications, you'll take a hit on yield.  I like Draw rate because it really helps sort out institutions at the top of the pecking order by looking beyond admit rates: The average industry draw is 0.37.  Meanwhile, Harvard is 25; Stanford is 22; Penn is 10; Northwestern is 7.6.  

Over time, the national draw rate has fallen, from 0.66 to 0.37.  At the Big 13 (second tab), it's gone from 3.0 to 14.  The race is over, folks.  

Use the filters at right to select single institutions or groups of colleges to see how things stacked up in 2022, and how they've changed over time.

The third view shows breakouts of male/female admit rates (IPEDS collects gender as binary, so that's their issue, not mine).  I selected institutions who had admit rates of less than 50% in 2022 and who received at least 1,500 applications.  Men are purple, women orange, and overall rates are shown in gray.

Finally, the last view shows the data in a spreadsheet format if you prefer.  Select the years you want, and groups for smaller selections.  I recommend no more than six years for the best view.

Some notes: There are always anomalies in IPEDS data, usually driven by mistakes in data submission or an inexperienced person filling out the form.  The data here is what IPEDS has.  And good luck with the Penn State data.  Up until 2019, the campuses reported separately.  Then in 2020 and 2021 they reported collectively, as The Pennsylvania State University.  And in 2022 we're back to the old method, apparently.  I'm not going to try to fix it.  Call them if you need the data in a format you can use.

Speaking of using, if you are a parent, student, or high school counselor, use this information widely and freely.  If you use it in your for-profit business, or if you use it to make points with your Board of Trustees at a college, you can support web hosting and software costs by buying me a coffee. Click here to do so.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Changes in AP Scores, 2022 to 2024

Used to be, with a little work, you could download very detailed data on AP results from the College Board website: For every state, and for every course, you could see performance by ethnicity.  And, if you wanted to dig really deep, you could break out details by private and public schools, and by grade level.  I used to publish the data every couple of years. Those days are gone.  The transparency The College Board touts as a value seems to have its limits, and I understand this to some extent: Racists loved to twist the data using single-factor analysis, and that's not good for a company who is trying to make business inroads with under-represented communities as they cloak their pursuit of revenue as an altruistic push toward access. They still publish data, but as I wrote about in my last post , it's far less detailed; what's more, what is easily accessible is fairly sterile, and what's more detailed seems to be structured in a way that suggests the company doesn...
Post a Comment
Read more

Educational Attainment and the Presidential Elections

I've been fascinated for a while by the connection between political leanings and education: The correlation is so strong that I once suggested that perhaps Republicans were so anti-education because, in general, places with a higher percentage of bachelor's degree recipients were more likely to vote for Democrats. The 2024 presidential election puzzled a lot of us in higher education, and perhaps these charts will show you why: We work and probably hang around mostly people with college degrees (or higher).  Our perception is limited. With the 2024 election data just out , I thought I'd take a look at the last three elections and see if the pattern I noticed in 2016 and 2020 held.  Spoiler: It did, mostly. Before you dive into this, a couple of tips: Alaska's data is always reported in a funky way, so just ignore it here.  It's a small state (in population, that is) and it's very red.  It doesn't change the overall trends even if I could figure out how to c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Changes in SAT Scores after Test-optional

One of the intended consequences of test-optional admission policies at some institutions prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was to raise test scores reported to US News and World Report.  It's rare that you would see a proponent of test-optional admission like me admit that, but to deny it would be foolish. Because I worked at DePaul, which was an early adopter of the approach (at least among large universities), I fielded a lot of calls from colleagues who were considering it, some of whom were explicit in their reasons for doing so.  One person I spoke to came right out at the start of the call: She was only calling, she said, because her provost wanted to know how much they could raise scores if they went test-optional. If I sensed or heard that motivation, I advised people against it.  In those days, the vast majority of students took standardized admission tests like the SAT or ACT, but the percentage of students applying without tests was still relatively small; the ne...
Post a Comment
Read more