Skip to main content

Yes, your yield rate is still falling, redux (2021)

I've been creating this data visualization, or some form of it, for several years now.  I think it's most useful for higher education enrollment professionals who have to explain to people at their university why their yield rate is falling.  The short answer is that applications and admits are increasing faster than student populations: If a student today applies to an average of seven colleges, compared to four colleges twenty years ago, yield rate almost has to go down.  I'm sure AI will fix this, and all our problems, very soon.

But I've spoken to others who use this other ways: To work with students to talk about chances for admission; to show parents how things have changed in the past twenty years; or to help journalists understand the lay of the land.  Whatever you use this for, I hope it's instructive, and I hope you feel free to share it widely.

And if you work in a college or university and save yourself some time by using this, or if you work with clients on a for-fee basis, I appreciate your support of the software and webhosting costs of Higher Ed Data Stories.  You can buy me a coffee here to show your support (if you're a high school counselor, just ignore this request; you should always consider your use of the site cost-free and guilt-free).

There are four views of the data, using the tabs across the top.  

Overview shows applications, admits, and enrolling students on the bar charts; and admit rate, yield rate, and draw rates on the lines at the bottom.  Draw rate (yield rate/admit rate) is a better indicator of market power, for a lot of reasons I've discussed elsewhere; in short, you can manipulate admit rate, but draw rate is generally much harder to do. (Generally does not always mean "always.")  You can look up the data of a single institution, or select subsets of the university of colleges shown, which is about 1,500 four-year, public and private not-for-profit institutions that admit first year students and report admissions data (if your institution is open admission, that data is not reported to IPEDS which is where I got the data.)

By Gender shows admit rates for men and women, along with the totals.  If the admit rate is over 50%, differences are less pronounced, so the x-axis only goes that high.  Choose a year to show changes.

By Regions breaks out several values (choose one at top left) for public and private colleges and universities by region.  Again, choose a year, and limit the data using the filters at right.

And the last view, Table Format, shows the data looking like a spreadsheet for those of you who don't like charts (you know who you are.)  The filters work the same, and as the note indicates, you should limit the number of years you select to ensure the table is legible.

Let me know if you spot anything of interest.  Ask your IR office if your data seems wrong.

Thanks for reading.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Changes in AP Scores, 2022 to 2024

Used to be, with a little work, you could download very detailed data on AP results from the College Board website: For every state, and for every course, you could see performance by ethnicity.  And, if you wanted to dig really deep, you could break out details by private and public schools, and by grade level.  I used to publish the data every couple of years. Those days are gone.  The transparency The College Board touts as a value seems to have its limits, and I understand this to some extent: Racists loved to twist the data using single-factor analysis, and that's not good for a company who is trying to make business inroads with under-represented communities as they cloak their pursuit of revenue as an altruistic push toward access. They still publish data, but as I wrote about in my last post , it's far less detailed; what's more, what is easily accessible is fairly sterile, and what's more detailed seems to be structured in a way that suggests the company doesn...
Post a Comment
Read more

Educational Attainment and the Presidential Elections

I've been fascinated for a while by the connection between political leanings and education: The correlation is so strong that I once suggested that perhaps Republicans were so anti-education because, in general, places with a higher percentage of bachelor's degree recipients were more likely to vote for Democrats. The 2024 presidential election puzzled a lot of us in higher education, and perhaps these charts will show you why: We work and probably hang around mostly people with college degrees (or higher).  Our perception is limited. With the 2024 election data just out , I thought I'd take a look at the last three elections and see if the pattern I noticed in 2016 and 2020 held.  Spoiler: It did, mostly. Before you dive into this, a couple of tips: Alaska's data is always reported in a funky way, so just ignore it here.  It's a small state (in population, that is) and it's very red.  It doesn't change the overall trends even if I could figure out how to c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Changes in SAT Scores after Test-optional

One of the intended consequences of test-optional admission policies at some institutions prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was to raise test scores reported to US News and World Report.  It's rare that you would see a proponent of test-optional admission like me admit that, but to deny it would be foolish. Because I worked at DePaul, which was an early adopter of the approach (at least among large universities), I fielded a lot of calls from colleagues who were considering it, some of whom were explicit in their reasons for doing so.  One person I spoke to came right out at the start of the call: She was only calling, she said, because her provost wanted to know how much they could raise scores if they went test-optional. If I sensed or heard that motivation, I advised people against it.  In those days, the vast majority of students took standardized admission tests like the SAT or ACT, but the percentage of students applying without tests was still relatively small; the ne...
Post a Comment
Read more