Skip to main content

Freshman enrollment and migration from 30,000 feet

You know I love this data set of freshman migration patterns over time.  It shows every college in two year increments, and contains the state-by-state makeup of the freshman class.  I like it for a couple of reasons: First, it's interesting in its own right to see where colleges attract students from.  I think students can use it too, to see how geographically diverse the colleges they're looking at really are.

But beyond that, there are so many questions you can pose this data and come away with some insight. Previously, I've visualized this data several times, most recently here, with a focus on helping high school and independent counselors add a layer of information to student choice sets.  This time, I think it might be of interest to enrollment management people and perhaps state policy makers.  Or anyone who finds this interesting.

If you find Higher Ed Data Stories helpful in your work and you're not a high school counselor, you can support the cost of building and hosting this site by buying me a coffee, here

The data are easy.  Getting it all on one chart can be hard, as you'll see.  And I kid you not, as I was typing just now, I thought of a new dashboard to add.  So I'm going to add an eighth view to this.

OK, done.  Here are the views:

Summary of enrollment shows the highest level view of freshman enrollment over time (with the understanding that the data in this set is for freshmen who enrolled within twelve months of high school graduation.)  Use the filters at right to view only types of student migration, or college or student regions, to see how those patterns differ.  Use the Highlight Selector to emphasize one sector.

Uber Summary contains a lot of information.  At left are overall patterns (the view starts with the US).  Choose a state using the filter if you wish; at far left are destinations by type.  You can see that in most years about 2/3 of all students enroll at a public institution in-state (the yellow bars).  Hover for more detail.  The columns break that data out even more.  You can see, for instance, that in 2018, 48.49% of all students nationally who enrolled out-of-state but in region enrolled in a four-year private college.  The interest comes when you look at different states.

Scatter with animation shows each state plotted by its rank among the states in two dimensions: How many students (number)  it exports, and what percentage of all students from that state the number represents.  Click through the arrows to animate over time, and I think you'll be surprised by how stable things appear to be.  By way of example, in 1996, Minnesota ranked 18th in number of exports, and 15th in percentage of exports.

Rank of export percent looks like a red hot mess, until you use the Highlight box at the top.  See how your chosen state fares over time on the percentage of freshmen it sends out-of-state.

Rank of export number is the same chart, but ranking raw numbers.

Single state allows you to see a state over time, with the total number of freshmen from that state (in gray) along with the number who stayed and the number who left.

State breakdown shows destinations of students by control, and Carnegie types.  After you choose a state of interest using the filter, and select the year, you can click on any bar and use that as a filter as well.

For-profits and non-residents shows how for-profit institutions have fared over time.  As you've seen from the previous charts, not a lot of freshmen who go to college within 12 months of graduation attend for-profits, so this is almost inconsequential.  However, what was surprising to me was the number of students these colleges attracted from out-of-state: An all-time record in 2020, despite COVID.

If you work in EM, you can use this to see how receptive that new market you're eyeing really is to colleges like yours.  If you work in higher ed policy in your state, you might find this compelling as you talk to people in your state house.  And if you work in a university but not in admissions, you might find that you don't make big changes overnight, and maybe those new markets aren't as attractive as you think they might be.

As always, leave me a not below with the things you find interesting.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Educational Attainment and the Presidential Elections

I've been fascinated for a while by the connection between political leanings and education: The correlation is so strong that I once suggested that perhaps Republicans were so anti-education because, in general, places with a higher percentage of bachelor's degree recipients were more likely to vote for Democrats. The 2024 presidential election puzzled a lot of us in higher education, and perhaps these charts will show you why: We work and probably hang around mostly people with college degrees (or higher).  Our perception is limited. With the 2024 election data just out , I thought I'd take a look at the last three elections and see if the pattern I noticed in 2016 and 2020 held.  Spoiler: It did, mostly. Before you dive into this, a couple of tips: Alaska's data is always reported in a funky way, so just ignore it here.  It's a small state (in population, that is) and it's very red.  It doesn't change the overall trends even if I could figure out how to c...

First-year student (freshman) migration, 2022

A new approach to freshman migration, which is always a popular post on Higher Ed Data Stories. If you're a regular reader, you can go right to the visualization and start interacting with it.  And I can't stress enough: You need to use the controls and click away to get the most from these visualizations. If you're new, this post focuses on one of the most interesting data elements in IPEDS: The geographic origins of first-year (freshman) students over time.  My data set includes institutions in the 50 states and DC.  It includes four-year public and four-year, private not-for-profits that participate in Title IV programs; and it includes traditional institutions using the Carnegie classification (Doctoral, Masters, Baccalaureate, and Special Focus Schools in business, engineering, and art/design. Data from other institutions is noisy and often unreliable, or (in the case of colleges in Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and other territories, often shows close to 100% of enro...

Education Levels in the US, by State and Attainment

Attainment has always been an interesting topic for me, every since I first got stunned into disbelief when I looked at the data over time.  Even looking at shorter periods can lead to some revelations that many don't make sense at first. Here is the latest data from NCES, published in the Digest of Education Statistics . Please note that this is for informational purposes only, and I've not even attempted to visualize the standard errors in this data, which vary from state-to-state.  There are four views year, all looking at educational attainment by state in 2012 and 2022.   The first shows data on a map: Choose the year, and choose the level of attainment.  Note that the top three categories can be confusing: BA means a Bachelor's degree only; Grad degree means at least a Master's (or higher, of course); and BA or more presumably combines those two.  Again, standard errors might mean the numbers don't always add up perfectly. The second shows the data o...