Skip to main content

A final post as a farewell and thanks

It's been said the Internet is like a party: You don't have to announce that you're leaving.

But this will be the final post on Higher Ed Data Stories.  After 4,183 days, it's time to call it quits.

To save myself the time necessary to reply to both of you who are still faithfully reading these posts, I feel compelled to offer a few words of explanation.

  • First, of course, is that I'm retiring from my full-time position at a university.  Much of what I did here was simply a sanitized version of what I was doing for my own work anyway, going back to the first post in 2013, which, if I recall, I was preparing for a conference presentation.
  • Also, I'll be doing more custom work for clients (he said, hopefully, as he watches higher ed teetering on the brink from the attacks of government and the public.)  I may do some consulting after I retire, via Enrollment VP and the companion blog.  (I guess this means I'll be doing requests, after all.)  You can subscribe to the latter, but it will mostly be written for presidents, provosts, and Board chairs.
  • Additionally, this Blogger platform is one of the few that will accept embedded Tableau visualizations, but the platform itself is old and doesn't work the way I want it to.  It's essentially the same one I started on in 2013.  And Google has a way of getting rid of its free products with little notice.  So thank you, Google, and thanks to th 1,890,000 visitors over the years (except the spammers).
  • Sort of related is the collapse of technology.  Not only did Google make it harder to share this content by eliminating subscriptions and notifications, but other places where I shared and promoted my work are also less valuable than they used to be: Twitter, for instance, and Facebook, where I recently left a college admissions group I helped create over a disagreement about sophomoric behavior by the moderators.  Tableau, too, deprecated some of the technology that allowed the older visualizations to run. They're gone, unless I try to re-publish them, which I'm not inclined to do at this point.
  • And finally, the East Coker reason, which I've pointed to before. It's from one of the Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot, and I've always been struck by this stanza:

So here I am, in the middle way, having had twenty years—
Twenty years largely wasted, the years of l'entre deux guerres
Trying to use words, and every attempt
Is a wholly new start, and a different kind of failure
Because one has only learnt to get the better of words
For the thing one no longer has to say, or the way in which
One is no longer disposed to say it. And so each venture
Is a new beginning, a raid on the inarticulate
With shabby equipment always deteriorating
In the general mess of imprecision of feeling,
Undisciplined squads of emotion. And what there is to conquer
By strength and submission, has already been discovered
Once or twice, or several times, by men whom one cannot hope
To emulate—but there is no competition—
There is only the fight to recover what has been lost
And found and lost again and again: and now, under conditions
That seem unpropitious. But perhaps neither gain nor loss.
For us, there is only the trying. The rest is not our business.

I think I've said (or tried to say) almost everything that needs to be said about our business, often on more than one occasion: 
  • Standardized testing is folly for college admissions purposes 
  • Students with advantages get most of the breaks in admissions
  • College Board is a business, not an educational entity, and letting them drive education is bad for everyone (except College Board)
  • Enrollment is complex, and the media frequently gets the story wrong precisely because they take a high-level, superficial view of the industry
  • The elite institutions aren't elite when it comes to their moral responsibilities to do more for access and opportunity
Of course, a lot of the time I tried not to lecture, but rather to put the data in front of people so they could see and interact for themselves.  I hope I surprised a few people and confounded a few more, and I hope the data here made a difference in the lives of a few students, parents, or counselors.

And finally, I'd be remiss if I didn't offer a word of thanks to Tom Mortensen, who was the first person I knew who took publicly available data and tried to tell a story--a really important story--with it.  He was the person who shone light on things for me, and helped me stay committed to this blog over the past eleven-and-a-half years.

Thanks to him, and thanks to you for coming along on this exploration. 

In my beginning is my end.
In my end is my beginning. 

Comments

  1. Thank you, Jon! I have learned so much from you over the years, and I wish you a long and healthy retirement.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Truly a pleasure reading your information/thoughts/wisdom over the years. Thank you for everything. Wishing you the best.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have enjoyed every post of yours I read and shared several. Will miss stopping by, thanks for the insights!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Many thanks for your important work over the years. You have always spoken truth to power (especially the profitable testing industry).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Educational Attainment and the Presidential Elections

I've been fascinated for a while by the connection between political leanings and education: The correlation is so strong that I once suggested that perhaps Republicans were so anti-education because, in general, places with a higher percentage of bachelor's degree recipients were more likely to vote for Democrats. The 2024 presidential election puzzled a lot of us in higher education, and perhaps these charts will show you why: We work and probably hang around mostly people with college degrees (or higher).  Our perception is limited. With the 2024 election data just out , I thought I'd take a look at the last three elections and see if the pattern I noticed in 2016 and 2020 held.  Spoiler: It did, mostly. Before you dive into this, a couple of tips: Alaska's data is always reported in a funky way, so just ignore it here.  It's a small state (in population, that is) and it's very red.  It doesn't change the overall trends even if I could figure out how to c...

First-year student (freshman) migration, 2022

A new approach to freshman migration, which is always a popular post on Higher Ed Data Stories. If you're a regular reader, you can go right to the visualization and start interacting with it.  And I can't stress enough: You need to use the controls and click away to get the most from these visualizations. If you're new, this post focuses on one of the most interesting data elements in IPEDS: The geographic origins of first-year (freshman) students over time.  My data set includes institutions in the 50 states and DC.  It includes four-year public and four-year, private not-for-profits that participate in Title IV programs; and it includes traditional institutions using the Carnegie classification (Doctoral, Masters, Baccalaureate, and Special Focus Schools in business, engineering, and art/design. Data from other institutions is noisy and often unreliable, or (in the case of colleges in Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and other territories, often shows close to 100% of enro...

Education Levels in the US, by State and Attainment

Attainment has always been an interesting topic for me, every since I first got stunned into disbelief when I looked at the data over time.  Even looking at shorter periods can lead to some revelations that many don't make sense at first. Here is the latest data from NCES, published in the Digest of Education Statistics . Please note that this is for informational purposes only, and I've not even attempted to visualize the standard errors in this data, which vary from state-to-state.  There are four views year, all looking at educational attainment by state in 2012 and 2022.   The first shows data on a map: Choose the year, and choose the level of attainment.  Note that the top three categories can be confusing: BA means a Bachelor's degree only; Grad degree means at least a Master's (or higher, of course); and BA or more presumably combines those two.  Again, standard errors might mean the numbers don't always add up perfectly. The second shows the data o...